There are a lot of people who think that I condone the kind of promiscuous outing of homosexuals. I don’t.
It would be epic trolling if Chuck Johnson wrote a defense of Gawker.
— William Freeland (@WilliamFreeland) July 17, 2015
Gawker is filling the gap left by Chuck Johnson.
— (((Dan Klein))) (@danhklein) July 17, 2015
Congratulations @max_read, you're Charles C. Johnson without an ideology
— scarin' vampeau (@AaronCampeau) July 17, 2015
Even I think what Gawker did today is fucked up. Why out someone just because who their sibling is? And working with male prostitutes to do that? Wow. Just wow.
That’s why I’m offering $500 for the name of the escort who extorted David Geithner, the CFO of Conde Nast. If you want to donate to increase that amount, go ahead up top.
Timothy Geithner was a loser as a Treasury Secretary. He didn’t pay his taxes. Even if you hate Geithner it seems wrong to beat up his brother, David, whose crime apparently is having the wrong brother and working for a competitor to Gawker.
And so what if his brother likes a little strange man on man action?
You’ll notice that the only times I’ve talked about people’s sex lives have been when they are predatory or massive hypocrites. If I were a liberal I would be a hero for exposing a corrupt ex-congressman.
A free society tolerates buggery as a private indulgence. Freedom of association includes the right to have anonymous gay sex.
And while all of you bitch about how bad Gawker is, I’m one of the very few doing something about it. Gawker has made up things about me in the past. My only recourse has been to sue them which I am currently doing.
.@WilliamFreeland Re: Chuck Johnson and Gawker: Great pt. These 2 opposing forces, locked in mutual hatred, are actually remarkably similar
— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) July 17, 2015
No, we have nothing in common. I am not a nihilist.
And there it is.